Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Galaxy M20's design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy M20's processor is very similar to the CPU in Galaxy S7 Active, and although the Galaxy M20 has a higher number of cores (although slower), they both have a 4 GB RAM. The Galaxy S7 Active shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M20 features greater battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.