Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a score of 98.9 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's also heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a faster processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores and 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a way better video resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.