Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with an 88.3 score against 75.8. Galaxy S10's design is newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel count per inch of display.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh. Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has better video frame rates and a larger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a bit more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.