Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's body is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, although it's also just a little bit heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels count in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and better video frame rates.
Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more money than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.