Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a overall score of 86.3 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and notably thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S10e features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a much better screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has faster video frame rate and a larger aperture. The Galaxy S7 Active features superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10e is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.