Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a general score of 93.4 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is a lot newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
The Galaxy S22 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a lot lower number of pixels in each screen inch and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a much brighter screen and a larger screen. The Galaxy S22 shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S7 Active has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S22 costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.