Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Galaxy S7 Active, having a overall score of 95.4 against 75.8. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is somewhat heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and also noticeably newer. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more cores and more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better looking display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a really brighter screen and a really bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.