Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 6.53 ounces | -- |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a general score of 82.6 against 75.8. The Galaxy S25 body is way lighter and extremely thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S25 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and much less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and much more brightness.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a very superior performance than Galaxy S25, although it has 4 lesser cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 and Samsung Galaxy S7 Active count with really similar batteries duration. Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.