Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 6.53 ounces | -- |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster).
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot brighter screen, a way bigger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.