Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with an 81 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a heavier phone than the Galaxy S7 Active, but both of them are 0.39inches thick. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels number per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a much higher 25 mega pixels resolution camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.