Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a score of 88.5 against 75.8. Galaxy Z Flip's body is noticeably newer, just a bit lighter and way thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Galaxy S7 Active has longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.