Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a 92.3 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is newer, just a little lighter and noticeably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a faster processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S7 Active features greater battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.