Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a 94.6 score against 75.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is incredibly newer and thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a much better pixels density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and a 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.