Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a global score of 90.6 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is noticeably newer and much thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is extremely heavier. Galaxy S7 Active features a much better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with a lot higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also has a lot larger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.