Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-06-10 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 6.53 ounces | -- |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a overall score of 81 against 75.8. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra construction is notably lighter and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3200 resolution, way more brightness and a really larger display.
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra features much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S7 Active features a really superior processing power than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi 12S Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with way more megapixels. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra features longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4800mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.