Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2024-02-22 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.75 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a general score of 84.4 against 75.8. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra construction is notably newer and just a little bit thinner, but heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much powerful processor than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (although faster) and less RAM memory.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a really larger display, a really brighter display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a bigger aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.