Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2024-09-26 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G615-MC6 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having an 83.7 score against 75.8. Although Xiaomi 14T is a little bit heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's notably thinner and also extremely newer. Xiaomi 14T counts with a brighter display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a lot larger screen and way more brightness.
The Xiaomi 14T features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a very superior CPU than Xiaomi 14T, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi 14T has longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi 14T counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi 14T also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.