Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2024-09-26 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro is much better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting a global score of 84.5 against 75.8. The Xiaomi 14T Pro body is incredibly newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a way better processing power than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores (but faster).
The Xiaomi 14T Pro features a much better display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a bit worse 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a much larger screen and a lot brighter display. Xiaomi 14T Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a way higher video quality.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi 14T Pro features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.