Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Blasting black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is incredibly newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Galaxy S7 Active. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a slightly better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent more battery size. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.