Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-04-21 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a score of 93.1, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Although the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's somewhat thinner and much newer. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and much more opaque display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.