Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-10-01 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T is better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a general score of 87.9 against 75.8. Although Xiaomi Mi 10T is somewhat heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's just a little thinner and also a lot newer. Galaxy S7 Active counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has way less brightness and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Xiaomi Mi 10T captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.