Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-10-13 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 81.2 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's design is much newer and thinner, but also heavier than Galaxy S7 Active. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a bit faster processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy S7 Active features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 200 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.