Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-10-01 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a global score of 90, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is a extremely newer and a bit thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's heavier. Galaxy S7 Active features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has much less brightness and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features superior battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a lot higher video quality and a way higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.