Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-06-17 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T is slightly better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 82.2 score against 75.8. Although the Xiaomi Mi 9T is a little heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's somewhat thinner and notably newer. Xiaomi Mi 9T has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit brighter display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater screen pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi 9T captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 9T's battery life is just as good as Galaxy S7 Active's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.