Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an overall score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro construction is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but a bit heavier than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active has a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, a little bit more brightness and more pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels and faster 60 fps video frame rates. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a battery life that is very similar to the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy S7 Active.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.