Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2016-06-10 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a global score of 83.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design is newer and somewhat thinner, but a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.