Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2016-06-10 | 2018-11-01 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a global score of 83.8 against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 design is extremely newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a lot smaller screen and less brightness, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a higher resolution camera and better video frame rates.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.