Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a general score of 84.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 design is newer and extremely thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a much lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a way larger screen, much more brightness and a higher 2224 x 2488 resolution.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a much powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although they are faster). The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has greater battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.