Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-11-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 construction is notably newer and a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a little faster processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit brighter display, a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixel number per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features improved battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.