Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-05-09 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having a global score of 80.6 against 75.8. Even though Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a bit heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's just a bit thinner and noticeably newer. The Galaxy S7 Active features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit opaque screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy S7 Active has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 200 GB. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has improved battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.