Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is extremely newer and thinner, but heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has much less brightness and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.