Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-03-27 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having a general score of 87.3 against 75.8. Although Xiaomi Poco F3 is just a little heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and extremely newer. Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has much lower brightness and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display. The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a way better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.