Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2022-06-23 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a overall score of 87.5 against 75.8. Even though Xiaomi Poco F4 is just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's notably thinner and also way newer. Galaxy S7 Active counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has a really smaller screen and much less brightness, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixels density.
Xiaomi Poco F4 has more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F4 features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13 percent more battery size. Xiaomi Poco F4 features a greater camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.