Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a 78.7 score against 75.8. Although Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels number per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features greater battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.