Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a general score of 78.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. Even though the Xiaomi Poco M3 is a little heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's a bit thinner and incredibly newer. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has more cpu cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.