Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-05-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having an 80.8 score against 75.8. Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's also a little heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter display than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also has a higher number of cores. Galaxy S7 Active features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 200 GB.
Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.