Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-11-11 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 5G MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G has a score of 81.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G body is way newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter display than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater count of pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G also has a higher number of cores (and faster). Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro 5G also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.