Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a global score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. Although the Xiaomi Poco X2 is heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and also extremely newer. Xiaomi Poco X2 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 200 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Poco X2 features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.