Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a general score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's body is way newer and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit more brightness, more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features improved battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.