Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-03-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having an 83.4 score against 75.8. Although the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is somewhat heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's a little bit thinner and also incredibly newer. The Galaxy S7 Active has a better display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more cores and more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 29% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.