Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a general score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Xiaomi Redmi 9T is a much newer and a little bit thinner device than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it's also a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has more CPU cores (although slower). Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.