Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is slightly better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a 78.3 score against 75.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 construction is way newer, somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy S7 Active. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a larger number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has much less brightness and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has improved battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.