Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-05-26 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a general score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is a little bit heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and also noticeably newer. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G also has 4 more processing cores.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 200 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.