Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, although it's also a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has much less brightness and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel count in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has improved battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro costs a little more than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.