Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having a 78.2 score against 75.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is a noticeably newer device, and it is also thinner and a little bit lighter than the Galaxy S7 Active. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (although slower).
The Galaxy S7 Active has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has much less brightness and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 200 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.