Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a general score of 86.1, which is better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro design is heavier but thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a little worse 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has improved battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.