Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2022-11-01 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, getting a global score of 75.8 against 75.7. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's construction is just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, but it's a lot thicker and was released many years before. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a higher pixels number per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has less processing cores (although faster) and lesser RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has superior battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.