Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a general score of 83, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T body is notably newer and a little bit thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has 4 more cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.