Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black, Ochre and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a global score of 76.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. ZTE Axon 10s Pro's body is newer, way thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a brighter screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same video definition, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.