Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Galaxy S7 edge, having an 89 score against 78.1. Google Pixel 5's design is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than Galaxy S7 edge. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 5 features a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 5 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and images, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a more megapixels camera in the back and better video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7 edge, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.